We don’t want actual ObjectIds strewn around our code. It’s useful to testing code that uses things like Mongo’s ObjectId. That’s great for setting functions as method mocks. The gist of fineProperty use with a function value boils down to:Ĭonst obj = console.log(obj.yes()) // false or true depending on the call :D As you can see, the yes property is not enumerated, but it does exist. non-enumerable properties that are functions. This post goes through how to use fineProperty to mock how constructors create methods, ie. #javascript JavaScript fineProperty for a function: create mock object instances in Jest or AVA Updates were rejected because the tip of your current branch is behind its remote counterpart. No rebase(s): merge the remote branch into local We’re now going to explore how to achieve a state in the local branch where the remote won’t reject the push. How can you get your local branch back to a state that’s pushable? These 2 cases should be dealt with differently. There tend to be 2 types of changes to the remote branch: someone added commits or someone modified the history of the branch (usually some sort of rebase). “the tip of your current branch is behind its remote counterpart” means that there have been changes on the remote branch that you don’t have locally. Remotes are useful to share your work or collaborate on a branch. a GitHub/GitLab/BitBucket/self-hosted Git server repository instance). A remote equates roughly to a place where you git repository is hosted (eg. A remote branch is one that exists on the remote location (most repositories usually have a remote called origin). A local branch is a branch that exists in your local version of the git repository. Git works with the concept of local and remote branches. I'm willing to chalk this up to git inexperience, but I figure that pulling changes should be a really common thing in git - I must be missing something.What causes ”tip of your current branch is behind”? I tried doing rebase, but it kept saying "no changes" and didn't ask me to check anything in? I'm pretty sure I don't understand what's going on here, which is why I posted my struggle so someone can explain how I could have avoided this mess and gotten from A to B more elegantly now that it's fully documented. $ rake spec # verify that it really works. $ patch -p0 < patchfile # apply the patchfile to master Now, how to recover the previous work so it's reviewable? $ git diff -no-ext-diff -no-prefix master.my_changes > patchfile $ git push origin +master # now, fork matches upstream/master Ignore that fast-forward crap, it won't help you, just reset the master. # Your branch is behind 'origin/master' by 8 commits, and can be fast-forwarded. $ git branch my_changes # just to make sure my stuff isn't lost Ok, if your repo is fubar, then here's steps to recover: $ git remote update # make sure origin and upstream are up to date The file is updated with conflict markers and you can choose which version you want to use and you can even edit it, in our example we get this in text.txt: > THE_UPSTREAM_BRANCHĪfter this, add the updated files with git add and execute git rebase -continue. You create a PR to update this to Lorem ipsum! and the upstream branch already changed this to Hello World If you do a rebase, to make your code up to date before creating a request, you get a merge conflict. For instance, assume that you have a text.txtfile like: Lorem ipsum Sometimes the rebasing can't continue, because something what you have changed was already changed in the upstream branch. Github says you use git merge for this, I prefer to use git rebase upstream/master if there aren't much changes, this will prevent merge commits. Before you going to push it to github to create the request, you should rebase your branch to the latest upstream branch. You should always create new branch for each Pull Request your create. It's not many changes, so if it's unrecoverable I can always manually diff and remaster it, but I'm looking for the "right way" to do this in the future.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |